Optimus Boston - Android 1.6

[aFriend]

Mas nota-se claramente os níves de cor assim como o ruido das imagens. Há muitas mais galerias que demonstram fotografias em diferentes ambientes, até mesmo de pouca luz e o iPhone não tem essa fraca qualidade.

Deixo aqui uma galeria de fotos tiradas com ele, em diferentes ambientes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuchana...228235507/

Resumindo, a qualidade de imagem de uma máquina não se mete em pixeis, como assim muita gente pensa.

_________________________

The reason for the discrepancy? The iPhone packs its 5 million pixels onto a 1/3.2-inch backside-illuminated CMOS sensor. Sensors with backside illumination technology move the wiring from the front side of the sensor to the back, so that it’s behind the light sensors. This allows more light to reach the sensors without being diffused by the circuitry, which means the camera can capture better low-light images.

Another factor contributing to the camera’s good low-light performance is the size of its pixels. Bigger pixels capture more light, which makes for better images. Apple retained the same pixel size that it had on previous iPhones instead of shrinking them down to fit more megapixels into a smaller area, which is something many cameras do to inflate their megapixel count.

As on many smartphones (including previous iPhones), the iPhone 4’s 3.85mm camera lens has a fixed aperture of f/2.8, and automatically adjusts the shutter speed and ISO to get the best exposure. In our tests, we managed to make the ISO go as low as 80, and as high as 1000. The longest exposure time was 1/15 of a second, and the shortest was 1/10000 of a second.

http://www.macworld.com/article/152314/2...tests.html